//

September 13, 2016 Council Rundown

New Sign edit

BUDGET PUBLIC HEARINGS

The Crime Board budget was first to be discussed. The Crime Board had already approved the budget but before it went before Council citizens were given an opportunity to speak on it. With no one present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

The council next moved to the Economic Development Corporation budget. This budget was already approved by the EDC. The public hearing was opened, but with no one wishing to speak the public hearing was closed.

The next budget that was discussed was the overall City budget. A public hearing was opened, and one citizen spoke. They questioned the need for the tax increase that was a part of the budget, saying home values are going up and so the City is getting more money anyways.

Continue reading

//

September 7, 2016 Council Rundown

New Sign edit

All council members were present for this specially called meeting. The agenda items for the meeting were to hold a work session on the budgets for the library and museum.

Council member Steve Ott questioned why this meeting was called. Mayor Ronald A. White explained that there was a citizen who raised questions about the library budget at a previous meeting and he wanted to make sure those questions had been answered. He also referenced what he called a “breakdown in communication”, saying he’d been informed that the museum didn’t receive all of the funds in their budget they had requested.

Mayor White asked Finance Director Phil Bray if the citizen’s questions about the library budget had been answered. Bray explained that the citizen was invited to come to City Hall where staff would go over the budget with them, but said that they did not come in. He stated that at a previous meeting when these questions were raised, staff attempted to answer them. The citizen was present, and said they’ve been unable to meet with staff, but would like to take them up on the offer and do so soon. They were told that the invitation is open.

City Manager Jim Ryan explained that the decrease in the library budget the citizen was questioning was from two years ago, when higher salary employees left the library and those that replaced them didn’t have the same qualifications, meaning that the new employees’ salaries were lower. Ryan again stated that the current library budget had not been cut or lowered, saying it was the only department to not be cut.

Moving to the museum budget, Deputy City Manager Jeff James addressed the council. He stated that it was simply a miscommunication, explaining that the budget documentation submitted by the museum made it appear as if they were only asking for $24,000 in funding. Lower on the document, there were an additional $6000 in expenses listed, but James stated that since the additional money wasn’t expressly being asked for it was thought that the museum was going to pay for those expenses using their donations. James said that moving forward they will use a more clear form of budget documents and will work to communicate more clearly with the museum and their board.

A discussion was held regarding ownership of some of the exhibits at the museum. While discussing using funds to repair exhibits, both Ryan and James touched upon the fact that this could mean spending tax dollars on something the City doesn’t own since there are exhibits at the museum that are on loan and not actually owned by the museum. “I don’t know if we really want to take taxpayer dollars and benefit a private citizen,” James said, saying this wasn’t advisable.

Ott pointed out that the museum board isn’t appointed by council, saying that the museum is its own entity that uses City property and is funded by the City. He suggested that this might need to be addressed, offering options such as making the museum an actual part of the city like the library and seniors center, or to stop funding the museum since it’s not officially a city department. Ott stated that it’s an auditing issue having the museum set up the way it is now.

Returning the discussion to the museum budget, council member Clements and Mann voiced support of funding the additional $6000 that is being asked for. Ott stated he was against it until he had more documentation about why they needed the additional funds.

One of the museum’s board members addressed the council in an attempt to answer some questions regarding the extra funds they requested. Ongoing security costs, damage to the museum building, and utilities were some of the things the extra money would go towards. They also said they believed making the museum a City department was an excellent idea.

Since this was a work session, no actions were taken by the Council.

//

August 30, 2016 Council Rundown

New Sign edit

Council member Steve Ott was absent due to an illness.

BUDGET WORK SESSION

The council continued their ongoing budget discussions. First up was the Crime Board budget, which Council has to either approve or deny and can’t make changes to. Council member Elzie Clements spoke first, thanking the Crime Board and the Police Chief for how much they were able to cut their budget. He spoke highly of the WSPD and said he appreciates the cuts, but hopes they didn’t cut too much. Council member David Mann, echoed this sentiment. City Manager Jim Ryan reminded them that much of the WSPD budget is also contained in the main budget in addition to what is in the Crime Board budget, saying it was the “single most important and expensive thing the City spends money on.”

Continue reading

//

August 24, 2016 Council Rundown

New Sign edit

All council members were present at the meeting.

INSURANCE TRUST AGREEMENT

Human Resources Director Mark Huff presented this item to the council. Huff explained that Cities have the opportunity to avoid being taxed by the state when it comes to insurance premiums if they set up a benefits trust. That trust has to be set up by the Council through a resolution. Mayor Ronald A. White asked how this benefits the City and its employees. Huff explained that it will save the City around $15,000. The City pays all of the employee’s insurance and subsidizes dependent coverage.

Council member Paul Moore made a motion to approve this resolution. That motion passed unanimously.

Continue reading

//

August 9, 2016 Council Rundown

 

New Sign edit

All council members were present for the August 9, 2016, meeting of the White Settlement City Council. After opening the meeting, council voted to move the executive session set for the end of the meeting to the beginning. This was done to avoid paying more attorney fees than necessary as part of the executive session required the council to speak with an attorney. Items highlighted on the executive session agenda were to seek advice from City Attorney and to conduct the performance reviews of City Manager Jim Ryan and City Secretary Amy Arnold.

After meeting in executive session, the council reconvened in open session. Council member Steve Ott made a motion directing staff to proceed as discussed in the executive session. That motion passed unanimously.

PUBLIC HEARINGS POSTPONED

Ott made a motion to postpone several planned public hearings that would deal with re-zoning, platting, and re-platting. Ott stated that he would like to see more documentation on these issues before council considered them. That motion passed unanimously.

Continue reading